Crafting clarifying options

I'm planning to ask a short clarifying question based on special user requests, offering numbered options for them. I want to keep formatting simple and avoid heavy use of bullets. I’ll summarize the context around the plausibility of release clauses in EPL being rare, noting that a £30m fee would be surprisingly low—definitely worth checking for any red flags. My options will be: 1) Quick draft 2) Background and feasibility analysis 3) English/Bilingual version 4) Source verification checklist and keywords 5) Data comparison (value, salary, position, compatibility with Barça). I'll keep it concise.Analyzing key implications

I want to provide a quick analysis if the claim holds true. For instance, a £30m fee versus an estimated value of £70-100m raises eyebrows, considering Rashford just extended his contract with Man U to 2028. The rarity of a release clause means it might be conditional, like depending on UCL participation. With Barça's FFP rules, any activation would need player acceptance.

I’ll create a concise checklist of points to verify, focusing on authorship credibility, contractual nature, terms and conditions, tax implications, and Manchester United's stance. It's essential to keep it concise without overwhelming details.Planning user interaction

I’ll start by asking the user what they need specifically. I want to include a brief plausibility note to offer context and a verification checklist to help them assess the information. Since there are no tools to run at the moment, I can also offer to draft a push for them. I will make sure to provide this output in Chinese as requested, keeping it clear and engaging to ensure the user understands and can respond easily.